Can Deepak singh defend the theft of google competitors savings, memory, correspondence, resume by R&AW/cbi/ntro openly

It appears that now R&AW is trying to defend its endless frauds on the google competitor through its associate Deepak singh on Quora , who is trying to cover up the atrocities, banking, financial fraud falsely saying that the google competitor is upset because she was not hired when actually the reason is very different, these organization are wasting tax payer money to defame her.

The google competitor is least interested in a government or other job because there are some risks involved like fake cases, which these organizations specialize in , however raw, cbi, ntro have stolen her retirement savings and are stealing her resume, memory and correspondence without a legally valid reason since 2010, causing great losses to the google competitor, in a clear case of human rights abuses, discrimination

NTRO, R&AW, cbi have also viciously defamed, cheated, and exploited the engineer and are wasting tax payer money to dupe people, companies and countries that their call girl, school dropout, cheater housewife, document robber and other fraud employees have the impressive resume, savings, of the google competitor, a private citizen. When these organizations are defaming the harmless engineer, she will defend herself and expose the fact that the employees of raw.cbi, ntro are shameless liars, cheaters with no personal and professional integrity

When R&AW/cbi employees are not experienced engineers, domain investors why are raw/cbi/ntro making fake claims why not honestly admit that they only employ google tata supplied goan prostitutes, school dropouts, cheater housewives and google,tata sponsored frauds and criminals who never answered JEE, why dupe companies, countries and people with their fake claims about domain ownership, engineering qualification and experience

NTRO/raw/cbi have stolen google competitor savings and falsely claim it belongs to their prostitute, cheater housewife and fraud employees when these lazy fraud employees never had a job, had no customers , no savings of their own in a clear case of defamation